<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Abnormal Returns - Latest Comments in What would Warren do?    Abnormal Returns</title><link>http://abnormalreturns.disqus.com/</link><description>A wide-ranging, forecast-free investment blog</description><atom:link href="https://abnormalreturns.disqus.com/what_would_warren_do_abnormal_returns/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:42:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What would Warren do?    Abnormal Returns</title><link>http://www.abnormalreturns.com/2009/11/what-would-warren-do/#comment-22799447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The conglomerate issue has Wall Street's shorts in a knot, because most of them lose focus. WB hasn't - he doesn't try to run the companies, only ensures that capable people are in place, and he continues to allocate capital. I suspect his successor will act in exactly the same manner. This isn't any tougher than running a mutual fund - only without the distraction of withdrawals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jay Walker&lt;br&gt;The Confused Capitalist &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Walker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:42:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What would Warren do?    Abnormal Returns</title><link>http://www.abnormalreturns.com/2009/11/what-would-warren-do/#comment-22026279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see if Berkshire can maintain it's aura after Buffett passes.  My guess is that it won't.  It will become just another conglomerate - though it could take decades for it to lose its association with Buffett entirely.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading my post and including it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FeirFactor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>